|
This is an AI summary of an article published by NY Times
(Archive link) Please click or tap on the above link if you want to read the original article instead of an AI summary. AI SummaryBernadine Bluntly now lives in St. Louis as a single mother of six, sharing custody after a divorce finalized in spring. She posts videos of herself learning to box, reads books cover to cover for the first time in years, attends a Presbyterian church, and networks with other women in business. Her Instagram bio simply reads “DV survivor and mama of 6.” The restraining order a Missouri court granted her last year keeps her former husband 300 feet away; she pays him modest child support from her remaining influencer income and still films content because, without the platform, she says she would have nothing. That platform once sold a very different story. In her late twenties, already mother to several children, she had built a following by advocating strict traditional gender roles under the name Bernadine Bluntly. She spoke against women’s suffrage, sold “R.I.P. Feminism” shirts, ran an online course teaching young women how to attract “godly” husbands, and produced reaction videos that racked up tens of millions of views celebrating masculine physical labor while urging women to “reject delusions” and embrace difference. Her husband posted complementary advice on becoming a strong patriarch. The couple framed her earnings as work performed under his headship, and constant pregnancies kept her physically tied to the home. The ideology that justified this arrangement had taken root early. Born in the Philippines, she lost her mother at four, moved to the United States at seven, and drifted through an unstable childhood until she converted as a teenager. By twenty-one she was married to a youth pastor after church pressure and a prophetic announcement made the match feel inevitable. Dreams of missionary teaching and creative work were gradually reframed as obstacles to biblical womanhood. Books on submission taught her that any marital trouble was hers to fix; leaving would mean disobeying God. Social media became both livelihood and cage—an approved creative outlet that also isolated her further. By May 2025, living off-grid with a four-month-old and five older children, no local church, and no freedom even to walk to the highway alone, she decided the arrangement was killing her inside. She locked herself in the outbuilding where she usually filmed, called the police, and met a patrol car at the end of the gravel path. Sisters drove through the night; the family bounced between motels and a shelter while she kept posting because the algorithm still paid the bills. Only after the divorce did she publicly reverse course, releasing a video titled “What I Got Wrong About the Trad Movement” that rejected extreme gender roles wrapped in spiritual language and apologized for any content that had encouraged fear or dependence. Her shift mirrors a wider fracture. High-profile figures once labeled tradwives have begun distancing themselves; other former adherents now monetize their exits with TikTok explainers and “ex-tradwife” branding. Leaving remains difficult when four, five, or six children and a husband’s investment in the doctrine are involved. Bluntly herself is still untangling a lifetime of patriarchal teaching, uncertain of her politics, open to the possibility of one more child or a future relationship if it arrives without coercion. What she wants the platform to do now is simpler: warn women about abuse and control inside religious or traditional circles, and make the life she rebuilt count for something beyond the role she once performed. |